“Specialty occupation” is a defined term, not a description. The E-3 classification borrows the same definition Congress wrote for the H-1B, which is a stricter standard than the one that applies to the H-1B1 category for Chilean and Singaporean nationals. Getting the right definition matters, because the two differ by a single word that carries real weight.
The statutory test. Section 214(i)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act defines specialty occupation, for both section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) and section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii), as an occupation that requires:
- theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and
- attainment of a bachelor’s or higher degree in the specific specialty, or its equivalent, as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States.
The word “highly” is doing work. The parallel definition for the H-1B1 category, at section 214(i)(3), is identical except that it requires only “specialized knowledge.” The E-3 is therefore held to the H-1B standard rather than the lighter free-trade standard. Descriptions of the E-3 that omit “highly” understate the test.
The degree must match the occupation. A bachelor’s degree in the abstract is not enough. The degree must be in the specific specialty, and it must be the normal minimum for entry into the occupation generally, not merely a credential this particular employer prefers. Positions in engineering, accounting, architecture, law, medicine, teaching, and many computer and scientific occupations commonly satisfy the test, but no occupation is automatically included and none is automatically excluded; the analysis turns on the actual duties and on what the occupation ordinarily demands.
Two questions, not one. The occupation must qualify, and the individual must be qualified for it. USCIS lists both separately, requiring a position that qualifies as a specialty occupation and possession of the necessary academic or other qualifying credentials. A well-credentialed candidate cannot rescue a position that does not require a degree, and a qualifying position does not help a candidate who lacks the credentials.
Equivalent credentials: an awkward gap. Section 214(i)(2) sets out the familiar alternatives for showing that an individual is qualified — full state licensure where licensure is required to practice, completion of the degree, or experience in the specialty equivalent to the degree together with recognition of expertise through progressively responsible positions. By its terms that paragraph applies only to section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), and not to the E-3. The Department of Labor’s definition at 20 CFR 655.715 nonetheless states the specialty occupation definition for the E-3 and H-1B programs together, applies those same qualification alternatives to both, and cites 8 U.S.C. 1184(i)(1) and (2). That regulation also renders the knowledge element as “specialized knowledge,” without “highly.” An equivalency argument for an E-3 therefore rests on the Department of Labor’s definition and on analogy to H-1B practice rather than on the E-3 statutory text.
Who makes the determination. The Department of Labor does not decide whether a position is a specialty occupation. Its role is to certify the Labor Condition Application for completeness and facial accuracy, and its own regulation allocates the specialty occupation and qualifications determinations to the Department of State and USCIS. In practice the judgment is made by the consular officer on a visa application, or by USCIS on a petition filed for a change of status, extension, or change of employer.
No DHS regulation to consult. Part 214 of title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations contains no E-3 provisions at all. The detailed evidentiary criteria developed for the H-1B at 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) do not apply to the E-3 by their terms, although they are widely used as a reference point when assessing whether a position meets the statutory definition.
Related questions in this section address the requirements for an E-3 visa and whether a license for the specialty occupation is needed. The E-3 overview introduces the category. Questions about a specific position may be directed to the firm through the contact page.